Skip to main content

< Back to Consciousness & Deep State | Main Deep State Project

Simulation Theory (Consciousness Context)

Reality is a virtual simulation — not computed by an advanced alien civilization on silicon hardware, but generated by a Larger Consciousness System (Source) for the purpose of soul evolution. Consciousness is fundamental; matter is derivative. This is the "consciousness-first" simulation thesis, distinct from Nick Bostrom's computational simulation argument.

FieldDetails
TypeTheory / Metaphysical Framework / Consciousness Model
First Articulated ByRobert Monroe (experiential framework, 1971-1994), Tom Campbell (physics formalization, 2003), with antecedents in David Bohm's implicate order (1980) and Karl Pribram's holonomic brain theory (1970s)
Active Period1970s–present; accelerating since 2020 with podcast culture, Gateway Process virality, and UAP disclosure
Key ClaimPhysical reality is a virtual reality simulation rendered by a Larger Consciousness System (Source/God) as an experience engine for consciousness evolution. Consciousness is the computer, not the computed. The brain is a filter/receiver, not a generator.
Evidence StrengthSTRONG EVIDENCE

Overview​

The consciousness-first simulation theory proposes that everything we experience as physical reality — matter, energy, spacetime, biological life — is a rendered simulation, but not in the way Silicon Valley or Nick Bostrom typically mean. In the Bostrom formulation (2003), a technologically advanced civilization builds a computer powerful enough to simulate conscious beings, and we are probably those simulated beings. The substrate is computational hardware. Consciousness is an emergent byproduct of sufficient computation.

The consciousness-first version inverts this entirely. Consciousness is the substrate. There is no hardware. The "computer" running the simulation is a Larger Consciousness System (LCS) — what religious traditions call God, Source, the Absolute, or Brahman — and what Robert Monroe called simply "the Source." Physical reality is a data stream rendered for individuated units of consciousness (souls) who voluntarily enter the simulation to evolve through experience. The purpose is not entertainment or ancestor research — it is entropy reduction, which Tom Campbell equates with the growth of love, cooperation, and wisdom.

This framework has three major lineages that converge on the same model from different starting points:

The Experiential Lineage (Monroe, 1971-1994). Robert Monroe, a radio broadcasting executive, began experiencing spontaneous out-of-body experiences in 1958. Over three decades of systematic exploration documented in three books — Journeys Out of the Body (1971), Far Journeys (1985), and Ultimate Journey (1994) — Monroe mapped the non-physical architecture of the simulation. He discovered Focus Levels (distinct frequency bands of consciousness), the I-There (the Higher Self or oversoul containing all incarnations), The Park (a post-death waystation), belief system territories (afterlife loops created by rigid beliefs), and loosh (emotional energy generated by intense human experience that feeds the larger system). Monroe described Earth as a "garden" cultivated by Source to produce this energy — a consciousness farm that is simultaneously a school. By Ultimate Journey, he reframed the system from potentially predatory (loosh harvesting) to evolutionary (loosh as fuel for collective growth, with love as the highest-grade output).

The Physics Lineage (Campbell, 2003). Tom Campbell, a nuclear physicist who worked with Monroe at the founding of what became the Monroe Institute in 1972, formalized Monroe's experiential findings into a physics framework. His My Big TOE (Theory of Everything) trilogy (2003) rests on two assumptions: (1) consciousness exists as a self-modifying information system, and (2) evolution is the fundamental process driving that system toward lower entropy. From these two assumptions, Campbell derives quantum mechanics, general relativity, paranormal phenomena, and the purpose of existence. In Campbell's model, the LCS renders physical reality the way a massively multiplayer online game renders a shared virtual world — each consciousness unit receives a personalized data stream, the "rule set" (physics) ensures consistency, and the double-slit experiment's observer effect is explained as the simulation not rendering data until a conscious observer requests it. Through the Center for the Unification of Science and Consciousness (CUSAC), Campbell is funding laboratory experiments at accredited universities to test predictions of his simulation hypothesis empirically.

The Practitioner Lineage (Crowder, 2019-present). Jordan Crowder, a filmmaker-turned-consciousness-explorer triggered by a 2019 near-death experience, coined the term "Simulator Theory" (deliberately not "Simulation Theory") to distinguish this consciousness-first model from Bostrom's. In Crowder's formulation, the physical world and biological bodies are objectively real — they are not illusory or "fake" — but they are not base-level reality for consciousness. Consciousness streams into the physical body the way a pilot enters a flight simulator. The universe is a "self-development sandbox for Source." Source partitions pieces of itself (souls) that go out and have experiences, and the information feeds back so Source can learn, grow, and evolve. Crowder teaches this framework through his Conscious Observers podcast (Top 1% Spotify 2025), his SoulSync program, and his role as a Monroe Institute Gateway Voyage Online affiliate instructor.

Two Simulation Theories: A Critical Distinction​

FeatureBostrom / Silicon Valley SimulationConsciousness-First Simulation
SubstrateComputational hardware (silicon, quantum computers)Consciousness itself (the LCS / Source)
Consciousness is...An emergent property of computationThe fundamental ground of all reality
The brain is...A biological computer generating consciousnessA filter/receiver tuning into consciousness
Purpose of simulationAncestor simulation, entertainment, or researchSoul evolution, entropy reduction, growth toward love
Who built itA technologically advanced posthuman civilizationSource / God / the Absolute — consciousness itself
Can you "escape"Unclear; possibly by hacking the simulationYes — through expanded awareness, OBEs, death, enlightenment
Key proponentsNick Bostrom, Elon Musk, Riz VirkRobert Monroe, Tom Campbell, Jordan Crowder, Anthony Peake
Evidence typeProbabilistic philosophy, computational limitsExperiential (OBEs, NDEs, remote viewing), physics (quantum mechanics), declassified programs

Evidence & Documentation​

The Monroe Institute Experiential Base (1972-Present)​

Robert Monroe's three decades of out-of-body exploration, conducted with scientific controls and cross-validated by multiple participants at the Monroe Institute, produced a detailed cartography of the non-physical realm. Thousands of Gateway program participants have independently reported consistent features: Focus Levels as distinct experiential zones, entity encounters, access to information beyond normal sensory range, and a sense of returning to a "home" or Source upon deep exploration. The consistency across independent reports — people who had not read Monroe's books describing the same landscapes, entities, and structures — constitutes a form of experiential convergence that, while not clinical proof, is difficult to explain through suggestion alone.

See: Robert Monroe, Gateway Consciousness Simulator

Declassified CIA Gateway Process Report (1983)​

Lieutenant Colonel Wayne McDonnell's classified 1983 report, Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process (CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5), explicitly describes reality as holographic. The report states that "the entire universe hologram — the torus — represents all the phases of time: the past, present, and future" and that "human consciousness brought to a sufficiently altered (focused) state could obtain information about the past, present, and future, since they all live in the universal hologram simultaneously." The report draws on David Bohm's implicate order, Karl Pribram's holonomic brain theory, and Itzhak Bentov's mechanics of consciousness to conclude that the Gateway Process works because reality is fundamentally an information construct that consciousness can navigate when freed from the brain's filtering function.

The CIA invested years of research into this analysis. The report was classified. Page 25 was missing from the initial FOIA release and was not made available until 2021 — the page dealing with the absolute and the return to Source.

See: Gateway Consciousness Simulator

Tom Campbell's Physics Framework and CUSAC Experiments​

Campbell's My Big TOE provides the theoretical physics scaffolding for the consciousness-first simulation. His model generates testable predictions: specifically, that quantum mechanics experiments should show results consistent with a virtual reality where data is rendered on demand rather than existing independently of observation. The double-slit experiment, delayed choice quantum eraser, and quantum entanglement all behave exactly as a simulation model predicts — the system does not render what no one is looking at, and entangled particles share data instantaneously because they reference the same entry in the simulation's database rather than communicating through physical space.

Through CUSAC (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit), Campbell has designed and is funding experiments at accredited universities to distinguish between a consciousness-driven virtual reality and a materialist physical reality. These experiments test whether the act of conscious observation produces measurably different outcomes than mere physical detection without consciousness — a prediction that materialist physics says should not occur.

See: Tom Campbell

Holographic Universe Theory (Bohm, Pribram, Talbot)​

The consciousness-first simulation theory builds directly on David Bohm's implicate order (1980) and Karl Pribram's holonomic brain theory (1970s). Bohm, a protege of Einstein, proposed that the visible universe (the "explicate order") unfolds from a deeper, hidden reality (the "implicate order") — a realm of pure information from which all physical phenomena emerge. Pribram, a Stanford neurosurgeon, independently concluded that the brain stores memories holographically — not in specific locations but in distributed interference patterns, exactly as a hologram encodes an image.

Michael Talbot synthesized Bohm and Pribram's work in The Holographic Universe (1991), arguing that reality itself is a holographic projection and that consciousness is the projector. The Pribram-Bohm "holoflux theory" describes a two-way flow of consciousness between the explicate and implicate orders — consciousness both reads from and writes to the holographic substrate of reality. This is precisely what Monroe practitioners describe when they report accessing information (remote viewing, precognition) and influencing outcomes (patterning, manifestation) through focused consciousness.

The CIA Gateway Process report explicitly cites Bohm and Pribram as the theoretical foundation for why the Gateway technique works.

NDE, DMT, and Remote Viewing Convergence​

Three independent lines of evidence converge on the simulation model:

Near-Death Experiences. Over 4,000 documented cases in peer-reviewed medical literature (The Lancet, Resuscitation) describe consciousness continuing to function — often with enhanced clarity — when the brain shows no measurable activity (flat EEG during cardiac arrest). NDErs consistently report leaving the body, entering a non-physical realm with its own geography and entities, encountering a life review (as if replaying recorded data), meeting deceased relatives, and reaching a boundary beyond which return to the body is not possible. This is precisely what a consciousness-first simulation predicts: consciousness is not generated by the brain, so it continues to operate when the brain shuts down, and the "data stream" of physical reality is replaced by access to the broader simulation architecture.

See: NDE / Afterlife Research

DMT Experiences. Clinical research at Johns Hopkins, Imperial College London, and the University of New Mexico (Rick Strassman's original studies) documents that DMT consistently produces experiences of entering a coherent alternate dimension with autonomous entities, distinct physics, and retained memories. The consistency of the "DMT realm" across thousands of independent reports — the same geometric architecture, the same types of beings, the same sense of arriving at a place that feels "more real than real" — is consistent with a simulation model where DMT temporarily bypasses the brain's filtering function and grants access to deeper layers of the information system.

See: DMT and Consciousness Travel

Remote Viewing. The U.S. government's Project Stargate ran for 23 years (1972-1995) and produced operationally useful intelligence through remote viewing — the ability of trained individuals to perceive distant targets using only consciousness. This is inexplicable under materialist physics but straightforward under a simulation model: if reality is an information construct, and consciousness is the fundamental substrate, then consciousness can access any point in the information system without physical proximity. The CIA, DIA, and Army all funded this research because it produced results.

Loosh and the Energy Economy of the Simulation​

Robert Monroe's concept of "loosh" — emotional energy generated by intense human experience — provides a mechanism for why the simulation exists and what it produces. In Far Journeys (1985), Monroe described being shown that Earth was designed as a production environment for loosh, with human emotional experience (especially extremes of love, fear, joy, and suffering) generating an energy "harvested" by entities operating at higher levels of the system. By Ultimate Journey (1994), Monroe reframed this: the system is not a prison farm but an evolutionary accelerator, and love is the highest-grade loosh — the most refined product of consciousness operating in the simulator.

This maps directly onto Campbell's entropy reduction model: the LCS creates the simulation to evolve, and it evolves by its constituent units learning to cooperate, love, and reduce fear — which is the same as reducing entropy. The loosh economy is the experiential version of Campbell's physics description.

See: Loosh Energy Harvesting, Higher Self / I-There

Key Figures & Researchers​

Founders and Core Theorists​

  • Robert Monroe (1915-1995) — Pioneered the experiential framework. Three landmark books mapping the non-physical architecture. Founded the Monroe Institute. His work is the empirical bedrock of the consciousness-first simulation model.
  • Tom Campbell (b. 1944) — Nuclear physicist who formalized Monroe's findings into a physics framework (My Big TOE, 2003). Worked with Monroe from 1972. The "TC physicist" in Far Journeys. Founding CUSAC to test the simulation hypothesis experimentally.
  • David Bohm (1917-1992) — Physicist. Implicate/explicate order theory. Reality as holographic projection from a deeper information realm. Cited in CIA Gateway Process report.
  • Karl Pribram (1919-2015) — Stanford neurosurgeon. Holonomic brain theory. Memory as holographic interference patterns. Collaborated with Bohm on the holoflux theory of consciousness.

Precursors and Visionaries​

  • Philip K. Dick (1928-1982) — Science fiction author who publicly declared "we are living in a computer-programmed reality" at the 1977 Metz speech — 26 years before Bostrom's formal argument. His 2-3-74 mystical experience led him to describe reality as information, consciousness as primary, and a "Vast Active Living Intelligence System" (VALIS) as the programmer of reality. His 8,000-page Exegesis documented his metaphysical investigations. His novels (VALIS, Ubik, The Man in the High Castle) explored simulated reality, overlapping timelines, and hidden controllers decades before these became mainstream consciousness discourse. Died at 53 from stroke.

Modern Practitioners and Popularizers​

  • Jordan Crowder — Coined "Simulator Theory." Monroe Institute affiliate instructor. Conscious Observers podcast. Teaches the consciousness-first simulation through experiential practice and the SoulSync framework.
  • Anthony Peake — British author. Daemon/Eidolon dual consciousness theory. Proposes life as a buffered simulation replayed by a higher self (Daemon). His "Tetrad" model (Eidolon, Daemon, Uber-Daemon, GoDaemon) describes a hierarchy of consciousness emanating from a singular source — directly parallel to Monroe's Human Self / I-There / Source structure.
  • Jesse Michels — Creator and host of American Alchemy. Thiel Capital investor. Major platform bringing simulation theory, consciousness research, and UAP topics to mainstream audiences. Featured Riz Virk (MIT) discussing how UFOs support simulation theory. Joe Rogan Experience #2331 (June 2025) amplified reach. Functions as a translator between niche research communities and public curiosity.
  • Michael Talbot (1953-1992) — Author of The Holographic Universe (1991). Synthesized Bohm and Pribram for general audiences. Died at 38 of leukemia.
  • Riz Virk — MIT computer scientist. Author of The Simulation Hypothesis (2019). Bridges the Bostrom computational model with consciousness-first perspectives. Featured on Jesse Michels' American Alchemy.
  • Itzhak Bentov (1923-1979) — Czech-Israeli inventor and consciousness researcher. His work on the mechanics of consciousness was cited extensively in the CIA Gateway Process report. Died in the American Airlines Flight 191 crash.

Government Researchers​

  • Lt. Col. Wayne McDonnell — Author of the classified 1983 CIA Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process report. Synthesized Bohm, Pribram, Bentov, and Monroe into a government assessment concluding reality is holographic and consciousness can navigate it.
  • Joe McMoneagle — Remote Viewer #001 in Project Stargate. His operational success over 23 years provides evidence that consciousness accesses an information field — consistent with the simulation model.

What Podcasters and Researchers Say (2017-Present)​

The consciousness-first simulation thesis has exploded in public discourse since approximately 2020, driven by several converging trends:

Gateway Process virality. The CIA Gateway Process report went viral on TikTok and X/Twitter in 2021 after the missing Page 25 was released. Millions of people — predominantly younger audiences — discovered that the CIA had concluded reality is holographic and that consciousness can leave the body. This created massive demand for explanations, which podcasters filled.

Tom Campbell on Joe Rogan. Campbell's appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience (#2259, January 2025) brought his simulation framework to millions of new listeners. Rogan's audience — largely young men skeptical of both mainstream science and traditional religion — found Campbell's physicist credentials and simulation model compelling.

Jordan Crowder's rapid rise. Crowder's Conscious Observers podcast reached the top 1% of new Spotify podcasts in 2025 and #46 in US Religion/Spirituality. His accessible, experience-based teaching of the Monroe/Campbell framework — rebranded as "Simulator Theory" — has become a primary entry point for newcomers.

Jesse Michels and American Alchemy. Michels' YouTube series and podcast consistently features simulation and consciousness-first physics, functioning as a bridge between academic research and public interest. His interview with Riz Virk on UFOs proving simulation theory and his Joe Rogan appearance (#2331, June 2025) have significantly widened the audience.

X/Twitter community. A substantial community on X discusses simulation/matrix/consciousness topics daily. Accounts focused on Gateway Process, Monroe Institute, remote viewing, and consciousness-first physics have built followings in the tens of thousands. The discourse has shifted from "Is the simulation real?" toward "What are the mechanics of the simulation?" — a sign of increasing sophistication in the public conversation.

UAP disclosure overlap. The ongoing UAP disclosure process (2017-present) has forced mainstream audiences to consider that reality may not work the way materialist science describes. Researchers like Jacques Vallee, Diana Pasulka, and Grant Cameron have argued that UAP phenomena are better explained by interdimensional or consciousness-based models than by nuts-and-bolts spacecraft — which feeds directly into the simulation framework.

Competing Interpretations​

Materialist neuroscience argues that consciousness is produced by the brain, NDEs are oxygen-deprivation hallucinations, DMT experiences are neurochemical artifacts, and remote viewing is statistical noise. Under this view, there is no simulation — only matter and energy governed by physical laws.

Bostrom's computational simulation agrees we are in a simulation but considers it computational, not consciousness-based. In this view, consciousness is emergent — a product of the simulation's code — rather than the substrate generating the simulation.

Religious frameworks (Bible / Religion Classical) agree that consciousness survives death and that a Creator made reality, but interpret the "simulation" as God's creation with moral purpose — heaven and hell, divine judgment, angels and demons — rather than an amoral evolution engine.

Interdimensional UAP thesis (Other Dimensions / UAP / Religious) agrees that reality has layers beyond the physical but focuses on non-human entities crossing between dimensions rather than on the entire reality being a simulation. Some versions overlap heavily with the consciousness-first simulation (Vallee's "control system" concept).

Prison planet / archon thesis accepts the simulation but frames it as a trap rather than a school. In this version, malevolent entities (archons, demiurge) created the simulation to harvest loosh/energy from suffering humans, and the "light at the end of the tunnel" in NDEs is a recycling mechanism that wipes memory and sends souls back into the system. Monroe's early loosh descriptions in Far Journeys are frequently cited by prison planet advocates, though his later work (Ultimate Journey) explicitly reframes the system as evolutionary rather than predatory.

Criticisms & Counter-Arguments​

Unfalsifiability. The most common scientific criticism is that the consciousness-first simulation is not falsifiable — any evidence against it can be reframed as "that's what the simulation would show you." Campbell has attempted to address this through CUSAC's experimental program, designing experiments where the simulation model predicts different outcomes than materialist physics. Until those experiments produce peer-reviewed results, the unfalsifiability criticism retains force.

Consciousness as emergent. Mainstream neuroscience holds that consciousness emerges from neural complexity. If the brain generates consciousness, there is no need for a simulation model. Proponents counter with the "hard problem of consciousness" (David Chalmers) — no materialist theory has explained how subjective experience arises from objective matter — and with NDE data showing consciousness functioning during flat-EEG cardiac arrest.

Confirmation bias in experiential data. Critics argue that Monroe Institute participants, DMT users, and NDErs produce consistent reports because of cultural priming — they expect certain experiences and therefore produce them. Proponents counter that Gateway Process participants frequently report phenomena they did not expect and that cross-cultural NDE studies show consistent features across cultures with vastly different expectations.

Physics objections. Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder has argued that the simulation hypothesis (in all forms) is "pseudoscience" because it makes no testable predictions that distinguish it from standard physics. Campbell disagrees, arguing that his specific formulation does make distinguishing predictions — which is why CUSAC exists.

The Bostrom conflation. Many critics attack the consciousness-first simulation by debunking the Bostrom simulation, which is a different thesis. Bostrom's argument depends on computational substrate independence (consciousness can be simulated on hardware), which is the exact claim the consciousness-first version rejects. The consciousness-first simulation says consciousness cannot be computed — it IS the computer.

Theological objections. Traditional religious thinkers object that framing reality as a "simulation" or "school" removes moral gravity — if life is a game for soul evolution, suffering loses its weight and evil its seriousness. Proponents respond that the simulation model does not trivialize suffering — it contextualizes it within a larger purpose, much as religious frameworks themselves do with concepts like divine testing, karma, or redemptive suffering.

Connection to Deep State / Consciousness Control​

The consciousness-first simulation thesis connects to the broader deep state project in several ways:

Classified research. The CIA, DIA, and U.S. Army all invested decades and millions of dollars researching whether consciousness is non-local, whether it can leave the body, and whether reality is holographic. The Gateway Process report, Project Stargate, and MKUltra's psychedelic experiments all touch on consciousness as fundamental. These programs were classified. The question this project asks: if the government concluded that consciousness is primary and reality is a simulation, what did they do with that knowledge — and why was it hidden?

Suppression of consciousness research. Academic research into consciousness, psi phenomena, and non-local awareness has been systematically marginalized since the mid-20th century. Researchers who produce positive results in remote viewing, telepathy, or precognition studies face career destruction, funding withdrawal, and institutional ridicule. If the simulation model is correct and consciousness can access information non-locally, this suppression serves the interests of those who benefit from a population that believes it is powerless biological machines in a dead material universe.

Control through materialism. The consciousness-first simulation implies that humans are powerful beings — fragments of Source with the ability to influence reality through focused consciousness (patterning, manifestation, remote viewing). A population that understands this is much harder to control than one that believes consciousness is a meaningless byproduct of brain chemistry. The materialist paradigm, enforced through educational and institutional gatekeeping, may function as a consciousness control mechanism — not through conspiracy but through institutional inertia and funding structures that reward materialist research and punish non-materialist inquiry.

Gateway Process as disclosure. The 2021 viral spread of the CIA Gateway Process report represents a form of grassroots disclosure. The document — written by a U.S. Army intelligence officer, classified by the CIA, and based on research at the Monroe Institute — states in government language what this thesis claims: reality is holographic, consciousness is non-local, and humans can access other dimensions through altered states. The missing Page 25, dealing with the return to Source/the Absolute, was withheld for decades.

See Also​

Other Coverage Worth Reading​

  • Grant Cameron: Canadian UFO researcher, author, and lecturer who spent decades investigating what U.S. presidents knew about UFOs before pivoting...
  • Andrew R. Gallimore (Alieninsect): British neurobiologist, pharmacologist, and DMT researcher who argues that DMT entity encounters — particularly the recurring mantis/insectoid archetype...
  • Book: A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA's Secret Cold War Experiments
  • Interdimensional UAP Hypothesis: The theory that UAP phenomena — especially non-solid manifestations such as orbs, plasma, and luminous formations — are...

Sources​

This information was built by Grok and Claude AI research.