Skip to main content

< Back to Main List

Jeff Fulgham — Georgia Election Integrity Investigator

FieldDetails
Full NameJeff Fulgham
RoleElection Integrity Investigator / Plaintiff / Researcher
BackgroundSergeant First Class (ret.), Army National Guard; U.S. Navy veteran; B.A. in History
Platform@jeffmfulgham on X (41K followers); BallotAssure.com research network
Notable WorkFiled Fulgham v. Ware County (ongoing); documented double-scanned ballots benefiting Biden on 11-11-2020
Evidence RatingSTRONG EVIDENCE — Dominion machine scan-time logs; evidence presented to Ware Superior Court Feb. 2024; parallel case confirmed by GASOS and FBI
StatusActive — litigation ongoing as of April 2026

Summary​

Jeff Fulgham is a retired U.S. Army National Guard Sergeant First Class and Navy veteran with a degree in history who independently investigated ballot anomalies in Ware County, Georgia following the 2020 presidential election. Working with election researcher Phillip Davis (ballotassure.com) — the same analyst who identified double-scanned ballots in Fulton County later confirmed by the Georgia Secretary of State's Office and the FBI — Fulgham obtained and analyzed Dominion ImageCast Precinct machine scan logs showing that ballots benefiting Biden were scanned for a second time on November 11, 2020, eight days after Election Day.

When Georgia's Secretary of State office and the State Election Board refused to investigate his formal complaint (Fulgham states he has email evidence of their refusal), he filed suit directly: Fulgham v. Ware County Board of Elections, pending before Ware Superior Court. He presented the scan-time evidence to the court in February 2024. As of April 2026, Ware County has refused to provide any public explanation and has "lawyered up," according to Fulgham. He is also seeking court costs for what he characterizes as the county forcing him into unnecessary litigation.

The Core Finding: Double-Scanned Ballots on 11-11-2020​

Fulgham's investigation centers on Dominion machine scan logs for Ware County that record the exact time each ballot was scanned. The logs show:

  • A normal batch of ballots was scanned during and immediately after Election Day (November 3, 2020)
  • Eight days later — on November 11, 2020 — a second scan session occurred
  • Ballots from this second scan disproportionately benefited Biden
  • No public explanation has been provided for who was in the election office that day or why ballots were re-scanned

The same analyst (Phillip Davis) who found these anomalies also identified the Fulton County double-scan issue, which was subsequently confirmed by the Georgia Secretary of State's Office (3,075–3,182 duplicate ballot images identified) and acknowledged by the FBI as part of the basis for their February 2026 search warrant and ballot seizure.

Image Evidence​

Dominion machine scan-time evidence presented to Ware Superior Court, February 2024, showing ballot re-scanning on 11-11-2020. Source: @jeffmfulgham on X, April 8, 2026.

Fulgham v Ware County — Dominion scan time evidence image 1Fulgham v Ware County — Dominion scan time evidence image 2Fulgham v Ware County — Dominion scan time evidence image 3Fulgham v Ware County — Dominion scan time evidence image 4 (tabular data)

The Lawsuit: Fulgham v. Ware County Board of Elections​

  • Venue: Ware County Superior Court, Georgia
  • Evidence presented: February 2024 — Dominion machine scan logs showing 11-11-2020 re-scanning session
  • County response: Ware County has retained legal counsel and refused to provide any public explanation
  • Current relief sought: Explanation for the double scans AND court costs for what Fulgham argues was unnecessary litigation caused by the county's evasion
  • Prior process: Fulgham states he worked with Ware County officials patiently before filing suit; they told him he would need to sue to get answers

The Broader Pattern: Phillip Davis and Both Counties​

Phillip Davis, working through BallotAssure.com, identified double-scanned ballots in both Ware County and Fulton County. The Fulton County finding became a confirmed case:

  • The Georgia Secretary of State's Office investigated and found 3,075–3,182 duplicate ballot images from the Fulton County recount
  • Investigators could not determine whether duplicates were included in the certified count
  • The State Election Board issued Fulton County a formal reprimand (2024)
  • The FBI conducted a search and seizure of Fulton County 2020 ballots in February 2026 based on a search warrant affidavit that cited these and related anomalies
  • Fulgham's Ware County case involves the same analyst and similar methodology — but without the same official acknowledgment

The Official Responses​

Georgia Secretary of State / State Election Board:

  • Refused to investigate Fulgham's formal complaint about Ware County
  • Fulgham states he has email documentation of this refusal
  • SoS subsequently confirmed the parallel Fulton County double-scan finding and reprimanded Fulton County

Ware County:

  • Refused to provide any voluntary explanation
  • Retained legal counsel after Fulgham filed suit
  • Has not issued any public statement as of April 2026

FBI:

  • Acknowledged the Fulton County double-scan issue as part of a February 2026 search warrant affidavit (the FBI seized Fulton County 2020 ballots)
  • Whether the FBI has taken any action related to Ware County is not publicly known

The Counterargument​

Official and mainstream responses to Georgia duplicate ballot claims generally assert:

  • Georgia conducted three full counts of 2020 ballots (machine count, hand audit, machine recount) — all confirmed Biden's margin
  • The Georgia Secretary of State (a Republican) and election officials stated duplicate scan findings in Fulton County reflected improper procedures by county workers, not intentional fraud
  • Former investigators concluded Fulton County's duplication was "not intentional misconduct"
  • No court has accepted duplicate ballot claims as sufficient to alter certified results
  • Ware County is a small rural county (population ~35,000) where a few hundred extra scans would not move statewide totals

Retaliation / Suppression​

  • GASOS and State Election Board refused to investigate his formal complaint despite documented evidence
  • Forced into costly Superior Court litigation to obtain answers the county could have provided voluntarily
  • Seeking court costs as compensation for the county's alleged deceptive conduct during pre-litigation cooperation
  • Ware County, Georgia — Primary Ware County investigation hub (includes both fractional voting and duplicate ballot claims)
  • Fulton County, Georgia — Parallel duplicate ballot case; State Farm Arena; FBI seizure Feb. 2026
  • Georgia — Statewide Georgia investigation hub
  • FBI — FBI's February 2026 ballot seizure; acknowledged double-scan issue
  • Dominion Voting Systems — Machine manufacturer; scan logs are from Dominion ImageCast Precinct

Other Coverage Worth Reading​

  • Tina Peters: Mesa County clerk who preserved Dominion logs before a "Trusted Build" update; convicted 2024; 29,000 deleted records confirmed.
  • Mark Cook: Testified in GA House that Dominion has a built-in untraceable backdoor; 10 seconds of testimony allegedly censored mid-sentence.
  • Maricopa County — Audit Deletion: Video surveillance and Dominion logs show officials allegedly deleting 2020 records before the Arizona Senate audit.
  • Fulton County, Georgia: FBI seized 2020 ballots Feb. 2026; 3,000+ duplicate ballot images confirmed by GASOS; State Farm Arena surveillance claims.

Sources​

This information was compiled by Claude AI research.