Skip to main content

< Back to Main List

Insider Trading and Pre-9/11 Put Options

The unusual and statistically anomalous stock market activity in the days before September 11, 2001 that suggests foreknowledge of the attacks.

FieldDetails
TypeFinancial Evidence / Foreknowledge
First Articulated ByFirst reported by CBS News and multiple financial outlets in the days immediately after 9/11; subsequently investigated by the SEC, the 9/11 Commission, and researchers including Michael Ruppert, Kevin Ryan, and Lars Schall
Active PeriodSeptember 2001 -- present
Key ClaimMassive and statistically anomalous volumes of put options were placed on American Airlines, United Airlines, and companies housed in the World Trade Center in the days before 9/11, indicating that someone with advance knowledge of the attacks profited -- or intended to profit -- from the destruction, and that official investigations deliberately suppressed the identities of the traders
Evidence RatingSTRONG EVIDENCE

Overview​

In the days leading up to September 11, 2001, an extraordinary volume of "put options" -- financial instruments that pay off when a stock's price falls -- were placed on the two airlines whose planes were hijacked (American Airlines and United Airlines) and on companies with offices in the World Trade Center, including Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch. The volume of these trades was so far outside normal patterns that it triggered internal alerts at the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and attracted immediate attention from regulators worldwide.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched an investigation and ultimately concluded there was "no evidence of insider trading" related to the attacks. The 9/11 Commission devoted a single paragraph to the topic, concluding the trades had "innocuous" explanations. However, the specifics of who placed the trades, how the SEC reached its conclusions, and the connections between the trading firms and US intelligence have raised more questions than the official investigations answered. Notably, $2.5 million in profits from the put options went uncollected after the attacks.

Multiple governments launched parallel investigations, and peer-reviewed academic research has concluded that the trading patterns were statistically consistent with informed trading. None of the investigations resulted in a single indictment.

Evidence & Documentation​

The Anomalous Trading Volume​

American Airlines (AMR) and United Airlines (UAL)​

The put option volume on United Airlines parent company UAL surged to nearly 100 times its normal level on September 6, 2001: approximately 2,000 put option contracts versus a normal daily volume of approximately 27. On September 10, 2001, put option volume on American Airlines (AMR) was approximately 60 times normal volume.

CBS News reported on September 19, 2001, that between September 6 and 10, 4,744 put options were purchased on United Airlines compared to only 396 call options -- a ratio approximately 11 times normal levels, dramatically skewed toward bets that the stock would fall. For American Airlines, 4,516 put options were purchased on September 6-7 versus only 748 call options -- approximately 25 times normal volume.

No comparable surge in put options was observed for other airlines during this period, indicating that the trades specifically targeted the two airlines whose aircraft would be hijacked.

Bloomberg News reported that trading in put options surged as much as 285 times the previous average volume in AMR and UAL during the days before September 11. According to Bloomberg's early October 2001 reporting, the SEC's probe initially encompassed 38 companies across multiple sectors, including American Airlines, United Airlines, Continental Airlines, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, American Express, AXA, Bank of America, Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, General Motors, and Raytheon. Much of this Bloomberg data was subsequently removed from public access and has become difficult to retrieve -- a fact noted by multiple researchers including Lars Schall, who documented the disappearance of key Bloomberg terminal data related to the pre-9/11 trades.

Companies in the World Trade Center​

Unusual put option activity was also recorded for:

  • Morgan Stanley Dean Witter -- which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center: 2,157 put options were purchased between September 7 and 10, compared to a daily average of approximately 27
  • Merrill Lynch -- headquartered near the WTC: 12,215 put options were purchased between September 7 and 10, compared to a daily average of approximately 252
  • Reinsurance companies including Munich Re and Swiss Re, which would face massive claims from the attacks

Market-Wide Indicators​

A peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Business (University of Chicago Press) in 2006 by Allen Poteshman, titled "Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001," found that the ratio of put options to call options on the airlines was "unusually high, which is consistent with informed investors having traded in the option market in advance of the attacks." The study used a statistical model to evaluate whether the trading patterns fell within normal market variation and concluded they did not.

A separate peer-reviewed study examined S&P 500 index options and found significant abnormal trading in the days before the attacks.

The SEC Investigation and Its Conclusions​

The SEC investigated the pre-9/11 trading and concluded: "We have not developed any evidence suggesting that those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks traded on the basis of that information."

The SEC's specific explanations included:

  • A single US-based institutional investor with "no conceivable ties to al-Qaeda" purchased 95% of the UAL put options on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American Airlines on September 10
  • The American Airlines put options were allegedly influenced by a bearish recommendation in the Options Hotline newsletter published on September 9, 2001
  • The Morgan Stanley trades were attributed to a newsletter-driven trading strategy

However, critical details of the SEC investigation have been challenged:

  • The SEC redacted the names of the traders in all released documents
  • The SEC's investigation files were partially destroyed, as confirmed by the SEC's own Inspector General
  • The classification of the investigation report for eight years prevented independent review
  • The "no conceivable ties to al-Qaeda" language is precisely crafted -- it does not say "no conceivable ties to any entity with foreknowledge"

The 9/11 Commission's Dismissal​

The 9/11 Commission addressed the insider trading question in a single paragraph in its final report (Chapter 5, footnote 130), concluding: "Exhaustive investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, FBI, and other agencies have uncovered no evidence that anyone with advance knowledge of the attacks profited through securities transactions."

The Commission did not address:

  • Why the names of the traders remain classified
  • The $2.5 million in uncollected profits
  • The Deutsche Bank / Alex Brown connection
  • The broader pattern across multiple securities
  • The academic studies finding statistically significant anomalies

Buzzy Krongard, CIA, and Deutsche Bank / Alex Brown​

A central and unresolved connection ties the trading to US intelligence:

  • A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard served as chairman of Alex Brown & Sons, the oldest investment bank in the United States, from 1991 to 1998
  • In 1997, Alex Brown was acquired by Bankers Trust, which was subsequently acquired by Deutsche Bank
  • In 1998, Krongard joined the CIA as Counselor to Director George Tenet
  • On March 16, 2001 -- six months before 9/11 -- Krongard was promoted to Executive Director of the CIA, the agency's third-ranking position
  • Deutsche Bank / Alex Brown was the financial institution through which the largest cluster of suspicious UAL put options was routed
  • Mayo Shattuck III, who succeeded Krongard at Alex Brown, resigned as CEO of Deutsche Bank Alex Brown on September 12, 2001 -- the day after the attacks

The fact that the former chairman of the bank through which the most suspicious trades were routed was serving as the third-highest-ranking official at the CIA at the time of the attacks has never been addressed by any official investigation.

The Uncollected Profits​

One of the most striking details is that $2.5 million in profits from the put options went uncollected after the attacks. As reported by the San Francisco Chronicle, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and other sources, someone placed bets worth millions that paid off spectacularly -- and then never picked up the winnings. The failure to collect profits from a successful trade is virtually unprecedented in financial markets and suggests the traders either feared identification or were unable to collect without exposure.

International Investigations​

Following the attacks, at least 13 countries launched investigations into possible insider trading, including Belgium, Cyprus, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Monte Carlo, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Despite the breadth of these investigations, none resulted in a single indictment anywhere in the world. This uniform result across independent jurisdictions has been interpreted in two ways: either there was genuinely no actionable insider trading, or a coordinated decision was made not to pursue the leads.

Key Figures​

  • Michael Ruppert -- Former LAPD narcotics investigator turned investigative journalist. Author of Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil (2004), in which he detailed the insider trading evidence and the Krongard/Deutsche Bank connection as part of a broader case for Cheney's management of the 9/11 operation. Ruppert died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound on April 13, 2014.
  • A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard -- Former Alex Brown chairman, CIA Executive Director on 9/11. The connection between his former bank and the suspicious trades remains the most significant unresolved institutional link.
  • Mayo Shattuck III -- Krongard's successor at Alex Brown and CEO of Deutsche Bank Alex Brown on 9/11. His resignation the day after the attacks has never been explained.
  • Kevin Ryan -- Researcher who compiled detailed analyses of the trading evidence and the identity questions
  • Lars Schall -- German financial journalist who conducted extensive investigation into the trading patterns and the Krongard connection
  • Max Keiser -- Financial journalist who stated he "heard firsthand about the airline put trade from brokers at Cantor Fitzgerald days before" the attacks
  • Allen Poteshman -- University of Illinois finance professor who authored the peer-reviewed study confirming statistically anomalous trading patterns
  • Philip Zelikow -- Executive director of the 9/11 Commission that dismissed the trading evidence in a single footnote
  • Bob Graham -- Senator whose Joint Inquiry touched on financial foreknowledge in the broader investigation

Criticisms & Counter-Arguments​

  • The SEC's "innocent trader" explanation: The SEC identified the large UAL put buyer as a legitimate institutional investor with a mixed trading strategy (simultaneously buying American Airlines stock), suggesting hedging rather than informed trading.
  • Newsletter recommendation: The Options Hotline newsletter's bearish call on American Airlines on September 9 could explain some of the AMR put volume.
  • Normal market fluctuation: Some finance scholars argue that when viewed over longer time periods, the options volume falls within the range of normal variation, particularly given that the airline industry was experiencing a downturn in September 2001.
  • Absence of indictments: The failure of 13 independent national investigations to produce a single indictment is cited as evidence that the trading was ultimately innocuous.
  • Selection bias: After any major event, it is possible to retroactively identify unusual trading patterns that coincidentally preceded the event, which may appear meaningful only in hindsight.
  • Counterargument to counterarguments: Proponents note that the SEC destroyed investigation files, redacted trader identities, and the Commission addressed the matter in a single footnote -- behavior inconsistent with a thorough and transparent investigation that found nothing.

See Also​

  • LIHOP vs. MIHOP -- Insider trading evidence supports both frameworks: foreknowledge (LIHOP) and possible orchestration (MIHOP)
  • The 28 Pages / Saudi Connection -- Saudi financial networks and their potential connection to foreknowledge
  • Israeli Foreknowledge / Mossad -- Foreign intelligence connections to foreknowledge
  • Controlled Demolition Theory -- If the buildings were demolished, the insiders who planted explosives would have had certain knowledge of destruction
  • Pentagon Attack Anomalies -- The financial offices destroyed at the Pentagon and the $2.3 trillion accounting question
  • Sibel Edmonds -- FBI whistleblower whose testimony touched on financial networks connected to the attacks
  • Bob Graham -- Senator who pushed for full investigation of all dimensions of 9/11

Other Coverage Worth Reading​

  • Sibel Edmonds: FBI translator discovered pre-9/11 intelligence on financial networks and was gagged by the DOJ under state secrets privilege.
  • Coleen Rowley: FBI agent's 13-page memo to Director Mueller exposed headquarters' deliberate blocking of the Moussaoui investigation before 9/11.
  • David Ray Griffin: Theology professor methodically catalogued 115 omissions and distortions in the 9/11 Commission Report.
  • Christopher Bollyn: Investigative journalist tracked Israeli intelligence connections to 9/11 and was subsequently arrested and prosecuted.

Sources​

This information was compiled by Claude AI research.